Unsolicited Christian Rhetoric: Panic Fire from
Cowards
I was once asked by an 82
year-old Christian who dedicated HIS
ENTIRE LIFE to preaching the word of god to heathen
like me, "Can you afford to be
wrong?"
I replied, "Can you?"
82 years of egg on your
face doesn't wash off easily now, does it?
Anyway, this man who
thought he had all the answers never provided one.
Instead, he tried to goad me into accepting his god -- a very
weak and predictable response. My, my, my. We all
have our lot to protect, don't we? Very typical, very
sad.
What really kills me is
how theists clamor about their deeply held sacred beliefs, yet
I've met very few who have even an ounce of true pure
faith. Faith is defined as the firm belief in something
for which there is no proof. Christian apologists devote
their lives to proving that their god is the one true
god. What kind of faith is that? Their actions fly
in the face of the true definition of faith.
I contend that anyone who
tries to prove the existence of their god or gods has no real
faith at all. For if they did, they'd be content and
secure in what they believe and leave it at that. The
only problem is, no one likes to stand
alone in their beliefs (religious and
otherwise).
The only way these
people can maintain those beliefs and not feel silly is
to get everyone else to believe the same things. Simple
as that. So they use bible lore (e.g., Matthew 28:19) as
an excuse to "make disciples of all nations" to quell their
own fears of standing alone in beliefs that are patently
ridiculous. The silliness they feel dissipates once
everyone is on the same page.
I can't prove that my
parents love me, but I have faith
that they do. (Love is intangible and may certainly be
demonstrated, but not concretely proven.) But here's the
thing. I don't feel compelled to prove anything to
anyone. Why is that? I am content and secure in my
belief that they love me. And neither do I care if
anyone believes that my faith is genuine, nor do I care if
anyone believes that my parents actually do love
me.
So why should it be any
different when it comes to belief in a god?
The answer is quite
simple. If it turns out that I'm completely wrong and my
parents never really loved me, then my intellectual integrity
is not compromised. I'm just a kid who wasn't loved by
his parents. However, if I lived my entire life praising
a god that didn't exist, one that was totally imaginary, then
I'd be the fool, thoroughly detached from reality, gullible
and intellectually challenged -- and we can't have that now,
can we?
Every time a Christian
attempts to prove that their god exists and that their
religion is true, the only thing revealed is their lack of true faith. Each
attempt smacks of insecurity about that in which they claim to
have faith. Remember that next time you're the victim of
Christian preaching and witnessing -- especially the
unsolicited kind. It's nothing more than panic fire
triggered by insecurity.
The remedy that Christians
seek to this patently obvious truth is their man-made,
self-correcting religion filled with all sorts of silly
rationalizations, technical loopholes, and excuses to explain
why such preaching is required. Of course, this is just
another integral part of their self-reinforced
delusion.
Mind you, they'll all deny
this, and that's fine and well. I'd never even try to
argue that all Christians necessarily engage in this sheepish
behavior...consciously, that
is.
The Subconscious Protects the Conscious
Self
We often have many motives
for doing the things that we do. So much of what we say
and do is triggered by our subconscious mind. I'm not a
psychologist, and I don't claim to be. What are my
qualifications to speak as an authority? None. But
I'm not speaking as one. This is common sense, so let's
apply a little. You don't have to shove your head in a
bucket of horseshit to know it will stink, and you don't have
to be a licensed psychologist to diagnose sheer and obvious
lunacy. Remember our little chat about the Heavens Gate cult? I'm sure you
and I both agree they were totally nuts. No
qualifications necessary.
On some level, every theist
has doubts about their faith whether it's in their forethought
or somewhere deeper in the mind. And you can remove
theists (and religion) from this argument. That is to
say, that we all have doubts about the things we say and
do. The degree to which we doubt varies, and so do our
acts (compensation) that are the result of that doubt.
For example, if you just invested a boatload of money in a
risky business endeavor or cheated on your spouse you might
toss and turn all night and have a hard time falling
asleep. This is the kind of thing we can all relate
to. It's part of the human experience from which no one
is immune.
There are few "sure
things" in life: stock market speculation, marriage, a new
career choice, or the eternal question at hand. There's
always some doubt, no matter how miniscule it may be, and
that's the essential point.
My best friend in high
school was a particularly bright, straight "A" college-bound
type. He went to medical school and he's now a
successful gastric bypass surgeon. But back then he was
always pushing the envelope to test the limits of peoples
convictions.
One night, at our standing
Saturday night poker game (yeah, we couldn't get dates back
then), I witnessed a rather disturbing experiment. He
got one of his father's revolvers (unloaded, of course) and
handed it to a fellow named Marc and dared him to point the
gun at his head and pull the trigger. Marc was invited
to examine the gun to verify that it wasn't loaded.
Keith encouraged him to point the gun at the floor and pull
the trigger 100 times to ensure that it was empty. Was
Marc's faith in his own ability to verify that the gun was
truly harmless great enough to risk the consequences of being
wrong? He quickly handed the gun back to Keith and told
him to go perform a certain sexual act with himself.
There's always doubt. Always. Just for the record,
I certainly don't encourage this kind of crazy behavior, but I
doubt you'd pull that trigger either. I sure as hell
wouldn't. (Pardon the pun.)
When it comes down to the
big serious stuff, the kind of stuff you can't undo, it's
always safest to play it safe and hedge your bets,
right? Such is the case with the question of your place
in eternity and those embrace and promote the silly notion
called Pascal's
Wager. We'll get back to this in just a
bit.
We all understand that the
brain is a powerful organ. For example, the power of
positive thought can effect our health in positive ways.
(Negative thought can have the opposite affect, like when you
worry yourself sick.)
Our subconscious is the
autopilot part of our mind. You know when you're driving down
the freeway and you zone-out for a mile or two? Then you
regain your focus, but you don't recall exiting the freeway or
passing the library. The conscious mind can detach
itself from the body. Your body did the mechanical stuff
(accelerated, braked, shifted, turned), some part of your
subconscious mind did the navigating, and some other part did
the fanaticizing about [insert object of desire here].
The bottom line is
that we often do things that our subconscious mind
controls.
Here's an extreme example
that's well-established: Ask any psychologist to profile a
hooker or porn actress, and 100-to-1 you'll likely hear about
someone who was molested as a child. There's no
conscious thought that says, "I was molested by my father when
I was a kid, so I think I'll become a hooker or do
porn." There's a deeply rooted psychological
cause-and-effect at work. Ask the hooker why she hooks
and you won't likely hear mention of her molestation.
You'll get a myriad of "excuses" as to why she does what she
does, but the real reason will remain safely tucked away in
her subconscious mind. Granted, this is an extreme
example, but it illustrates my point.
I don't expect a theist to
admit that they're fearful of standing alone in their faith,
and that's why they try to convert others to their belief
system. I'm asserting that they aren't even aware that
they're doing this. In the spirit of fairness I'll
concede that it works the other way, too. You could
fairly argue that someone like myself, an atheist, might do
the same. The difference is that I have no desire to
convert anyone. I don't want anyone to abandon their
religious beliefs. As I've already mentioned, I
just object to all the crusading.
Many Christians use the
built-in excuse that they're instructed by Saint Matthew (and
others) to spread the word, but it is nothing more than just
that -- a very convenient excuse. Okay, I can't help but
chuckle at the utterly insane thought of comparing a theist to
a hooker either, but an excuse is an excuse. The
subconscious mind is at work in all of us.
Welcome to the
Christian Learning Annex A Free
Educational Service Courtesy of the
Godless Bastard
HOW TO WITNESS
Help Thy
Neighbor
There's a common driving
practice that involves flashing ones headlights to warn
oncoming drivers of police looking to catch speeders.
(Unbelievably, this practice is avoided in certain parts of
the country due to silly urban legends about a gang initiation
rite that involves shooting at a driver who flashes his
lights.)
The big question is, why
do people engage in this practice? Why do we do
it? At first thought, the obvious answer is to save some
poor slob from getting a speeding ticket. Some people
are motivated by the desire to screw the police by foiling
their attempt to ticket someone. Generally, I think most
are just trying to help out the little guy, at least at the
conscious level.
I think there's more to
it, though, if not at the conscious level, certainly the
subconscious level. Try to extrapolate the act.
Think about it for a moment. Ask yourself if there's
another, deeper reason why we do this.
I think we do this not
just to help out the guy who's about to get a ticket, but also
to help ourselves. When you flash your lights you're
helping someone you probably don't know, most likely someone
you'll never even meet face to face. Hell, you might not
even like this person, but you do it anyway. Why is
that? I know that I do it not just to help out the other
guy, but also in the hopes that if we all work together,
someday someone will do the same for me in an act of
reciprocity. I wash your back, you wash mine. That
is, when we help others, we also help ourselves. When we
protect others, we also protect ourselves. This
principle applies to many aspects of life.
Partners
in Delusion
In order to protect
ourselves, we have to act publicly. In this example, we
have to flash our lights for all to see. That's how we
learn. If I do it, others see, they will eventually
catch on, they will eventually follow suit, and we all
benefit. That's how we protect one another. If
it's not a public display, then the whole thing is for
naught. If you don't flash your lights, the guy will get
a ticket. We'll all get a ticket. Again, this
logic applies to many aspects of life.
People who believe in god
often do this. Religious fanatics constantly do
this. They have to. This is how they protect
themselves. This is how they keep themselves from
looking and feeling foolish -- again, at the subconscious
level.
As I mentioned before, any
sane adult would feel foolish believing in the Easter Bunny
unless, of course, everyone else did. So religious
people flash their theistic headlights in a public display of
faith in order to protect each other and, therefore, help
themselves. They flash their fish and dove logos on the
backs of their cars. Their bumper stickers
proclaim...
Real Men Love Jesus My Boss is a Jewish
Carpenter No Jesus, No Peace. Know Jesus, Know
Peace. God said it, I believe it, that settles
it!
That settles it?
Well alrighty then. And I'm the philosophically
arrogant one? Right.
I find it amusing that so
many of their symbols are displayed so prominently on their
cars. Sort of a virtual flashing of their headlights,
don't you think? They flash their crucifix necklaces and
dashboard statues. They distribute their prayer cards in
our parks, their bibles in our hotels. They spray their
graffiti upon our currency ("In God We Trust") and soothe each
sneeze with a courteous "god bless you." This is a
patently public display of faith. This is how they make
themselves easily identifiable. This is how they flash
their headlights. This is how they protect
themselves. For some, it's their subconscious
intellect-saving instinct at work but, regardless, for most
theists the ultimate intent and modus operandi remains the
same.
When confronted with this
argument, Christians, for example, will start quoting specific
bible verses that allude to their responsibility to spread
"The Word." Again, nice excuse. Their words and
actions serve but one true and ultimate purpose: they are the
manifestation of a desperate, subconscious attempt to ensure
the theistic safety that membership in the club
provides.
Think about it. How
could anyone possibly feel silly or foolish believing in god
and all those ridiculous bible stories when so many other
people who also believe surround them?
MENTAL MASTURBATION
FOR THE RELIGIOUSLY DELUDED Lesson One
Repeat
the following paragraph over and over again (and perform
the indicated bodily gestures) until you firmly convince
yourself that god exists:
How can you possibly call me
crazy for believing in god? Look!
[point an index finger at the
mindless masses] He
believes and she believes and they believe!
I'm not alone! You think I'm some lunatic
who's lost touch with reality because I believe in
an all-powerful supreme being who sits upon his
heavenly throne way up in the sky, who created
everything in the universe in just six twenty-four
hour days, who had an earthly son born of a virgin
mother, who walked on water, who healed the blind
with a touch of his hand, who raised himself as
well as others from the dead, and performed
countless other seemingly impossible
feats?[fold arms in
defiance and tap a foot
impatiently] Well, Mr.
Atheist, answer me this: How can I possibly
be wrong if everyone else believes as I
do?
How
can I possibly call you crazy? Because your belief
in god is a self-reinforced delusion, and dragging
others into it doesn't change that. Lunacy, like
misery, loves (and needs) company to
prosper.
And
how could you possibly be wrong? For all
the same reasons that I could possibly be
right.
I Won't Believe Your Eyes (Even Though You
Do)
For most people who want so desperately for something to be
true it invariably becomes their reality (and therefore their
truth) solely by virtue of their desperation. Desperate
people are generally immune from feeling silly, but those who
aren't need to find [read: manufacture] some proof to back
them up and squelch that intellect-killing silliness.
And no one on this planet is better at manufacturing proof
than your average, garden variety Born-Again Christian.
Knowledge is observed fact
verified by repeatable experiment. Belief is the conclusions you draw about
the order of things based on your observations and those of
others. The problem most people have is that they limit
their input of observations to those that match their
prejudices. Basically, people see what they want to
see. It's called the confirmation bias
in psychology. We all do it. We all look for
confirming evidence and ignore disconfirming evidence to
support our beliefs. It's a natural phenomenon.
This is why people are so hell bent (pardon the pun) on
proving the existence of their god.
"Faith may be defined briefly as an
illogical belief in the occurrence of the improbable. A
man full of faith is simply one who has lost (or never had)
the capacity for clear and realistic thought. He is not
a mere ass: he is actually ill." - H.L.
Mencken
Theists: The Faithless
Faithful
On some level, perhaps subconsciously, theists inherently
feel silly believing in the seemingly impossible and must feel
part of the whole in order to quiet their latent
insecurities. I doubt there are many who would have the
courage to maintain their faith openly (or even in secret) if
they were to wake one morning and find themselves standing
completely alone in their beliefs.
Religion is supposed to be a deeply personal thing, but
theist love to publicize their belief system and paint it upon
everyone. They use words like we, us, and our in a very
cavalier manner when it comes to expressions of what should be
very personal religious beliefs:
The Lord Our
God Our Lord and Savior God Give Us Strength Heaven
Help Us
Theists have even managed to shove their beliefs into
biological functions (as offered in response to a sneeze and
passed off as courtesy):
God Bless
You!
Theists, specifically Christians, have institutionalized
references to their god:
In God We
Trust In the Year of Our Lord
Such arrogance! In god we
trust? Who exactly is this "we" they're referring to? Who are
they speaking for? I have lots of money, but I don't
share that belief. So why is it forced on me? And
tell me, which of the many gods that are honored and praised
around the world do "we" have all
this great trust in? One of the Hindu deities,
perhaps?
I wonder how Christians would feel if all their $20 bills
read:
In Vishnu We
Trust
And I would just love to see their reaction to:
One nation,
under Krishna, with liberty and justice for
all...
Seems to me that this kind of theistic "we" bravado exists
to provide intellectual safety for those who do believe.
And they, quite unfortunately, represent the vast
majority.
The majority won't stand alone in its faith simply because
with its numbers it simply doesn't have to. I've been an
atheist all my adult life and I've stood (nearly) alone in my
beliefs for most of that time. I don't feel compelled to
speak for anyone else. I never use we, us, or our with regard to my beliefs --
and there are 20 million (admitted) atheists and agnostics who
share my beliefs in the United States alone! You see,
people with true faith and conviction aren't afraid to
use words like "I" when
referring to statements of belief.
I have enough faith in my beliefs to stand alone, so why
can't the majority? Because it's just nice to have
someone around to back you up. Hey, who really
likes eating alone anyway?
Plan B: The Cowardly
Sneak-Attack
Many Christians try to covertly entice others into joining
their little club. Next time you go to In-N-Out Burger,
pick up a soft drink cup, turn it upside down* and look on the inside
rim. You will see "John
3:16". It is literally the smallest part of the
cup, and if you think they chose it for no particular reason
then you're an idiot. It's intentional,
covert, and the act of a coward.
This passage from the New Testament reads:
"For God so loved the world, that
he gave his only begotten Son, that so whosoever believeth in
him should not perish, but have everlasting
life."
Now, the fine folks at In-N-Out would have a Sunday school
teacher armed with various written propaganda stationed at the
front door of each of their restaurants if they actually
thought it would convert people, but they're not quite that
stupid. They know that all the patrons want is a burger,
some fries, and a diet Coke -- and they want it fast so they
can get the hell out of there. So the owners cut their
losses and took what they could get. Like cowards, they
decided to force (albeit covertly) their unsuspecting patrons
to take a little bit of god with them. This allows them
to delude themselves into believing that they are actually
spreading god's (alleged) word. Perhaps they even
believe that this act ensures them a place in heaven.
* The
Godless Bastard is not responsible for damages incurred by
those too stupid to make sure the cup is empty
first.
Please note that their covert Christian
rhetoric doesn't end with the soft drink
cups. Many of their items are packaged (paper wrapped)
with bible verses. Also, in front of every In-N-Out
location you will find a pair of crossed palm trees (logo),
which clearly represent the Christian cross.
Needless to say, I now get my burgers elsewhere...extra
cheeses, hold the Jesus.
Welcome to
the Islam Learning Annex A Free
Educational Service Courtesy of the
Godless Bastard
HOW TO TEACH THE INFIDELS A
LESSON
The Last Resort: Go Ahead. I Dare
You!
Sometimes you'll hear theists argue that it's better to
follow their religion than to be an atheist, simply because if
the atheist is right nothing happens when he dies, but if the
theist is right he goes to heaven while the atheist goes to
hell. This is called Pascal's Wager
(named after the brilliant yet religiously deluded French
philosopher Blaise Pascal who authored it). His argument
is faulty and therefore invalid for several reasons. But
first, here's an example of the pure cowardice that embraces
it...
A former Christian coworker, Rodger, once made me his
conversion pet project. He hounded me with his silly
Jesus rhetoric for 5 years. The more I fleered and
rejected his offerings, the harder he preached. I'm a
bit ashamed to admit this, but I enjoyed watching his
frustration mount. You'd think he would eventually sense
the futility of the situation and save his time and energy for
a more productive endeavor, but he was one resilient little
bastard. (It's no surprise he was in sales!) He
used to tell me how he spent his evenings formulating his plan
of attack to prove his god's existence to me. If he had
a modicum of common sense he would have walked away in search
of weaker prey. However, eventually, in a pathetic act
of desperation and shear cowardice, he resorted to
daring/scaring/goading me into accepting Christ. Like a
mindless robot, he regurgitated the following cowardly,
sheepish, bet-hedging, if you can't beat 'em join 'em mantra
(below), just like the one thousand times he probably
rehearsed it in his head.
MENTAL MASTURBATION
FOR THE RELIGIOUSLY DELUDED Lesson Two
Repeat
the following paragraph over and over again (preferably
with a monotone iambic pentameter lilt, almost like
you're chanting) until you firmly convince yourself that
believing in god is the safe bet.
If you accept Christ and there is no
god, then you have nothing to lose. If you
reject Christ and there is no god, then you have
nothing to lose. If you accept Christ and there
is a god, then you have everything gain. If you
reject Christ and there is a god, then you have
everything to lose. All you have to do is
accept him and you can't possibly
lose!
Very
good! Now you sound just like
Rodger.
How can anyone call this faith? How pathetic.
Talk about playing it safe! This is the mentality of
someone who doesn't know what true faith is. Accepting
any god just to play it safe is the act of a coward, someone
who is afraid to stand alone with his beliefs (or lack
thereof). When I asked him if his god was all knowing,
he replied, "Of course." I said, "Well, then, he would
know that I'm accepting him just to play it safe. Don't
you think he would be just a little insulted by such
disingenuousness and damn me anyway because I tried to pull
one over on him?" He stammered a few times,
mumbled something unintelligible and walked away.
Rodgers all-knowing god must be so proud of him. Bravo,
Rodger! Bravo! At any rate, his incessant
preaching stopped when he left the company. Amen!
What follows is a textbook example of how Christians use
Pascal's Wager to make themselves feel better about their
own faith-related insecurities and the fear of possibly
being wrong.
Well I do commend you on your
strong convictions. I myself am of the belief of Christ
as my lord and savior. It's unfortunate you've been
given such a message that you have interpreted as "hate
mail". I'm not going to preach at you or try and sway
you in my direction in any way, shape or form. It is
quite obvious that you have gotten the message and
choose to reject it. I understand that you are very
happy and satisfied with your life and beliefs. I am
too. Happier than you can imagine. (or perhaps you
can)
What really seperates us though
fundementally is this:
I believe that when I die, I go
to heaven.
You believe that when you die,
that's it. Game over.
Seeing that we have now both
professed our belief or lack thereof in an afterlife, I
have to say that I have a bit of an advantage over
you. If you're right, when I die, that's it. I will have
lived a happy life and hopefully, did some good things
for the world. Guess what though, I'll never know the
difference and STILL have had a happy life just like
you.
On the other hand, if I'm right,
I go to heaven and live eternally happy AFTER my happy
life here on earth. Unfortunately, based on my beliefs
of your "enlightend" view of things, your afterlife
doesn't look so peachy. I'm sure you're VERY aware of
the Christian beliefs on what happens to people with
your point of view.
So, in the end, lets tally the
score cards:
If you're right, we both live
happy productive lives here on earth and then we
die. Sounds like a tie game to me so
far...
If I'm right, then I go on living
eternally after I die. I don't have to go into detail
what would happen to you. You've heard enough fire,
brimstone, hell and damnation already.
In the end, I have everything to
gain and nothing to lose based on my belief whether I'm
right OR wrong. You unfortunately, aren't afforded the
same "tie game" if you're wrong.
It is what it is. Not going to
try and convert you to ANYTHING. Hey, I even admire
you're conviction in your belief and your admission that
you're willing to let me go on with mine. That's quite
admirable! I acknowlege your bad experiences with the
hell and damnation "bible thumpers" you've encountered
and it saddens me that the message you've gotten seems
to be of hate when that's not at ALL what the God I
believe in is about.
Good luck to you. If you'd like
to talk about other subjects, feel free to shoot me an
email!
Tony
Adams
Don't you just love how he tells me TWICE that he's not
trying to convert me or preach to me. Tell me folks, is
he self-deceiving, clueless, or just a really bad
liar? I can hear him repeating his mantra over and over
again in his head as if to convince himself, just one more
time, that he's on the right track.
Sad and insecure, folks. It's just sad and
insecure.
Congratulations! You've just been
introduced to the cowardly, faithless world of Christian
Apologetics, courtesy of Rodger. Now visit
his Comrades in Cowardice in The Hall of Shame.