Unsolicited Christian
Rhetoric: Panic Fire from
Cowards I was once asked by an 82 year-old
Christian who dedicated HIS ENTIRE
LIFE to preaching the word of god to heathen like me,
"Can you afford to be
wrong?"
I replied, "Can you?"
82 years of egg on your
face doesn't wash off easily now, does it?
Anyway, this man who
thought he had all the answers never provided one.
Instead, he tried to goad me into accepting his god -- a very
weak and predictable response. My, my, my. We all
have our lot to protect, don't we? Very typical, very
sad.
What really kills me is
how theists clamor about their deeply held sacred beliefs, yet
I've met very few who have even an ounce of true pure
faith. Faith is defined as the firm belief in something
for which there is no proof. Christian apologists devote
their lives to proving that their god is the one true
god. What kind of faith is that? Their actions fly
in the face of the true definition of faith.
I contend that anyone who
tries to prove the existence of their god or gods has no real
faith at all. For if they did, they'd be content and
secure in what they believe and leave it at that. The
only problem is, no one likes to stand
alone in their beliefs (religious and
other).
The only way these
people can maintain those beliefs and not feel silly is
to get everyone else to believe the same things. Simple
as that. So they use bible lore (e.g., Matthew 28:19) as
an excuse to "make disciples of all nations" to quell their
own fears of standing alone in beliefs that are patently
ridiculous. The silliness they feel dissipates once
everyone is on the same page.
I can't prove that my
parents love me, but I have faith
that they do. (Love is intangible and may certainly be
demonstrated, but not concretely proven.) But here's the
thing. I don't feel compelled to prove anything to
anyone. Why is that? I am content and secure in my
belief that they love me. And neither do I care if
anyone believes that my faith is genuine, nor do I care if
anyone believes that my parents actually do love
me.
So why should it be any
different when it comes to belief in a god?
The answer is quite
simple. If it turns out that I'm completely wrong and my
parents never really loved me, then my intellectual integrity
is not compromised. I'm just a kid who wasn't loved by
his parents. However, if I lived my entire life praising
a god that didn't exist, one that was totally imaginary, then
I'd be the fool, thoroughly detached from reality, gullible
and intellectually challenged -- and we can't have that now,
can we?
Every time a Christian
attempts to prove that their god exists and that their
religion is true, the only thing revealed is their lack of true faith. Each
attempt smacks of insecurity about that in which they claim to
have faith. Remember that next time you're the victim of
Christian preaching and witnessing -- especially the
unsolicited kind. It's nothing more than panic fire
triggered by insecurity.
The remedy that Christians
seek to this patently obvious truth is their man-made,
self-correcting religion filled with all sorts of silly
rationalizations, technical loopholes, and excuses to explain
why such preaching is required. Of course, this is just
another integral part of their self-reinforced
delusion.
Mind you, they'll all deny
this, and that's fine and well. I'd never even try to
argue that all Christians necessarily engage in this sheepish
behavior...consciously, that
is.
The Subconscious Protects
the Conscious Self We often have many motives for
doing the things that we do. So much of what we say and
do is triggered by our subconscious mind. I'm not a
psychologist, and I don't claim to be. What are my
qualifications to speak as an authority? None. But
I'm not speaking as one. This is common sense, so let's
apply a little. You don't have to shove your head in a
bucket of horseshit to know it will stink, and you don't have
to be a licensed psychologist to diagnose sheer and obvious
lunacy. Remember our little chat about the Heavens Gate cult? I'm sure you
and I both agree they were totally nuts. No
qualifications necessary.
On some level, every theist
has doubts about their faith whether it's in their forethought
or somewhere deeper in the mind. And you can remove
theists (and religion) from this argument. That is to
say, that we all have doubts about the things we say and
do. The degree to which we doubt varies, and so do our
acts (compensation) that are the result of that doubt.
For example, if you just invested a boatload of money in a
risky business endeavor or cheated on your spouse you might
toss and turn all night and have a hard time falling
asleep. This is the kind of thing we can all relate
to. It's part of the human experience from which no one
is immune.
There are few sure things
in life. Virtually everything is a crap shoot on
some level or to some degree. Stock market speculation,
marriage, a new career choice, or the eternal question at
hand. There's always some doubt, some uncertainty, and
some risk no matter how miniscule it may appear to
be.
My best friend in high
school was a particularly bright, straight "A" college-bound
type. He went to medical school and he's now a
successful gastric bypass surgeon. But back then he was
always pushing the envelope to test the limits of peoples
convictions.
One night, at our standing
Saturday night poker game (yeah, we couldn't get dates back
then), I witnessed a rather disturbing experiment. He
got one of his father's revolvers (unloaded, of course) and
handed it to a fellow named Marc and dared him to point the
gun at his head and pull the trigger. Marc was invited
to examine the gun to verify that it wasn't loaded.
Keith encouraged him to point the gun at the floor and pull
the trigger 100 times to ensure that it was empty. Was
Marc's faith in his own ability to verify that the gun was
truly harmless great enough to risk the consequences of being
wrong? He quickly handed the gun back to Keith and told
him to go perform a certain sexual act with himself.
There's always doubt. Always. Just for the record,
I certainly don't encourage this kind of crazy behavior, but I
doubt you'd pull that trigger either. I sure as hell
wouldn't. (Pardon the pun.)
When it comes down to the
big serious stuff, the kind of stuff you can't undo, it's
always safest to play it safe and hedge your bets,
right? Such is the case with the question of your place
in eternity and those embrace and promote the silly notion
called Pascal's
Wager. We'll get back to this in just a
bit.
We all understand that the
brain is a powerful organ. For example, the power of
positive thought can effect our health in positive ways.
(Negative thought can have the opposite affect, like when you
worry yourself sick.)
Our subconscious is the
autopilot part of our mind. You know when you're driving down the
freeway and you zone-out for a mile or two? Then you
regain your focus, but you don't recall exiting the freeway or
passing the library. The conscious mind can detach
itself from the body. Your body did the mechanical stuff
(accelerated, braked, shifted, turned), some part of your
subconscious mind did the navigating, and some other part did
the fanaticizing about [insert object of desire here].
The bottom line is
that we often do things that our subconscious mind
controls.
Here's an extreme example
that's well-established: Ask any psychologist to profile a
hooker or porn actress, and 100-to-1 you'll likely hear about
someone who was molested as a child.
There's no conscious
thought that says, "I was molested by my father when I was a
kid, so I think I'll become a hooker or do porn."
There's a deeply rooted psychological cause-and-effect at
work. Ask the hooker why she hooks and you won't likely
hear mention of her molestation. You'll get a myriad of
"excuses" as to why she does what she does, but the real
reason will remain safely tucked away in her subconscious
mind. Granted, this is an extreme example, but it
illustrates my point.
I don't expect any theist to admit that
they're fearful of standing alone in their faith and that's
why they try to convert others to their belief system.
In fact, I'm asserting that they aren't even aware that
they're doing this. In the spirit of fairness I'll
concede that it works the other way, too. You could
fairly argue that someone like myself, an atheist, might do
the same. The difference is that I have no desire to
convert anyone. I don't want anyone to abandon their
religious beliefs. As I've already mentioned, I
just object to all the crusading.
Many Christians use the
built-in excuse that they're instructed by Saint Matthew (and
others) to spread the word, but it is nothing more than just
that -- a very convenient excuse. Okay, I can't help but
chuckle at the utterly insane thought of comparing a theist to
a hooker either, but an excuse is an excuse. The
subconscious mind is at work in all of us.
Welcome
to the Christian Learning Annex A Free
Educational Service Courtesy of the
Godless Bastard
HOW TO
WITNESS
Help Thy
Neighbor There's a
common driving practice that involves flashing one's
headlights to warn oncoming drivers of police looking to catch
speeders. (Unbelievably, this practice is avoided in
certain parts of the country due to silly urban legends about
a gang initiation rite that involves shooting at a driver who
flashes his lights.)
The big question is, why
do people engage in this practice?
At first thought the
obvious answer is to save some poor slob from getting a
speeding ticket. And then there are many who
are motivated solely by the joy of foiling police in
their attempt to cite someone (and generate yet more money for
the city). But regardless of the prime justification, I
believe there is a fundamental motivator which can
be found at
the subconscious level.
Think about it for a
moment. Ask yourself if there's another, deeper reason
for why we do this.
Personally, I think
we flash our headlights to help
ourselves.
Let's try to extrapolate the
act.
When you flash your lights
you're helping someone you probably don't know and (most
likely) someone you'll never even meet face to face.
Hell, you might not even like this person. This could
very well be someone that you'd be justified in hating, yet
you help then out anyway. Why is that?
I know that I do it not
just to help out the other guy, but also in the hope that if
we all work together someday someone will do the same for me
in an act of reciprocity.
This is truth. When
we help others we also help ourselves. I wash your back, you wash
mine.
This principle applies to
many aspects of life.
Partners in
Delusion In order to protect ourselves, we have to
act publicly. In this example, we have to flash our
lights for all to see. That's how we learn. If I
do it, others see, they will eventually catch on, they will
eventually follow suit, and we all benefit. That's how
we protect one another. If it's not a public display,
then the whole thing is for naught. If you don't flash
your lights, the guy will get a ticket. We'll all get a
ticket. Again, this logic applies to many aspects of
life.
People who believe in god
often do this. Religious fanatics constantly do
this. They have to. This is how they protect
themselves. This is how they keep themselves from
looking and feeling foolish -- again, at the subconscious
level.
As I mentioned before, any
sane adult would feel foolish believing in the Easter Bunny
unless, of course, everyone else did. So religious
people flash their theistic headlights in a public display of
faith in order to protect each other and, therefore, help
themselves. They flash their fish and dove logos on the
backs of their cars. Their bumper stickers
proclaim...
Real Men Love Jesus My Boss
is a Jewish Carpenter No Jesus, No Peace. Know Jesus,
Know Peace. God said it, I believe it, that settles
it!
That settles it?
Well alrighty then. And I'm the philosophically
arrogant one? Right.
I find it amusing that so
many of their symbols are displayed so prominently on their
cars. Sort of a virtual flashing of their headlights,
don't you think? They flash their crucifix necklaces and
dashboard statues. They distribute their prayer cards in
our parks, their bibles in our hotels. They spray their
graffiti upon our currency ("In God We Trust") and soothe each
sneeze with a courteous "god bless you." This is a
patently public display of faith. This is how they make
themselves easily identifiable. This is how they flash
their headlights. This is how they protect
themselves. For some, it's their subconscious
intellect-saving instinct at work but, regardless, for most
theists the ultimate intent and modus operandi remains the
same.
When confronted with this
argument, Christians, for example, will start quoting specific
bible verses that allude to their responsibility to spread
"The Word." Again, nice excuse. Their words and
actions serve but one true and ultimate purpose: they are the
manifestation of a desperate, subconscious attempt to ensure
the theistic safety that membership in the club
provides.
Think about it. How
could anyone possibly feel silly or foolish believing in god
and all those ridiculous bible stories when so many other
people who also believe surround them?
MENTAL MASTURBATION FOR THE RELIGIOUSLY DELUDED Lesson One
Repeat
the following paragraph over and over again (and perform
the indicated bodily gestures) until you firmly convince
yourself that god exists:
How can you possibly call me
crazy for believing in god? Look!
[point an index finger
at the mindless masses]
He believes and she believes and they
believe! I'm not alone! You think I'm
some lunatic who's lost touch with reality because
I believe in an all-powerful supreme being who
sits upon his heavenly throne way up in the sky,
who created everything in the universe in just six
twenty-four hour days, who had an earthly son born
of a virgin mother, who walked on water, who
healed the blind with a touch of his hand, who
raised himself as well as others from the dead,
and performed countless other seemingly impossible
feats?[fold arms in defiance
and tap a foot
impatiently] Well, Mr.
Atheist, answer me this: How can I possibly
be wrong if everyone else believes as I
do?
How
can I possibly call you crazy? Because your belief
in god is a self-reinforced delusion, and dragging
others into it doesn't change that. Lunacy, like
misery, loves (and needs) company to
prosper.
And
how could you possibly be wrong? For all
the same reasons that I could possibly be
right.
I Won't Believe Your Eyes
(Even Though You Do) For most people
who want so desperately for something to be true it invariably
becomes their reality (and therefore their truth) solely by
virtue of their desperation. Desperate people are
generally immune from feeling silly, but those who aren't need
to find [read: manufacture] some proof to back them up and
squelch that intellect-killing silliness. And no one on
this planet is better at manufacturing proof than your
average, garden variety Born-Again Christian.
Knowledge is observed fact
verified by repeatable experiment. Belief is the conclusions you draw about
the order of things based on your observations and those of
others. The problem most people have is that they limit
their input of observations to those that match their
prejudices. Basically, people see what they want to
see. It's called the confirmation bias
in psychology. We all do it. We all look for
confirming evidence and ignore disconfirming evidence to
support our beliefs. It's a natural phenomenon.
This is why people are so hell bent (pardon the pun) on
proving the existence of their god.
"Faith may be defined briefly as an
illogical belief in the occurrence of the improbable. A
man full of faith is simply one who has lost (or never had)
the capacity for clear and realistic thought. He is not
a mere ass: he is actually ill." - H.L.
Mencken
Theists: The Faithless
Faithful On some level, perhaps
subconsciously, theists inherently feel silly believing in the
seemingly impossible and must feel part of the whole in order
to quiet their latent insecurities. I doubt there are
many who would have the courage to maintain their faith openly
(or even in secret) if they were to wake one morning and find
themselves standing completely alone in their beliefs.
Religion is supposed to be a deeply personal thing, but
theist love to publicize their belief system and paint it upon
everyone. They use words like we, us, and our in a very
cavalier manner when it comes to expressions of what should be
very personal religious beliefs:
The Lord Our
God Our Lord and Savior God Give Us Strength Heaven
Help Us
Theists have even managed to shove their beliefs into
biological functions (as offered in response to a sneeze and
passed off as courtesy):
God Bless
You!
Theists, specifically Christians, have institutionalized
references to their god:
In God We
Trust In the Year of Our Lord
Such arrogance! In god we
trust? Who exactly is this "we" they're referring to? Who are
they speaking for? I have lots of money, but I don't
share that belief. So why is it forced on me? And
tell me, which of the many gods that are honored and praised
around the world do "we" have all
this great trust in? One of the Hindu deities,
perhaps?
I wonder how Christians would feel if all their $20 bills
read: In Vishnu We
Trust
...or if their pledge ended with: One nation, under Allah, with liberty and
justice for all.
Seems to me that this kind of theistic "we" bravado exists
to provide intellectual safety for those who believe in the
Judeo-Christian god. And quite unfortunately, they
represent the majority.
The majority won't stand alone in its
faith simply because with its numbers it simply doesn't have
to. I've been an atheist all my adult life and I've
stood (nearly) alone in my beliefs for most of that
time. I don't feel compelled to speak for anyone
else. I never use we, us, or
our with regard to my beliefs -- and there are 20
million (admitted) atheists and agnostics who share my beliefs
in the United States alone! You see, people with true
faith and conviction aren't afraid to use words like "I" when
referring to statements of belief.
I have enough faith in my beliefs to stand alone, so why
can't the majority? Because it's just nice to have
someone around to back you up. Hey, who really
likes eating alone anyway?
Plan B: The Cowardly
Sneak-Attack Many Christians try to
covertly entice others into joining their little club.
Next time you go to In-N-Out Burger, pick up a soft drink cup,
turn it upside down and look on the inside rim.* You will see John 3:16. It is literally
the smallest part of the cup, and if you think they chose it
for no particular reason then you're an idiot. It's
intentional, covert, and the act of a coward.
This passage from the New Testament reads:
"For God so loved the world, that
he gave his only begotten Son, that so whosoever believeth in
him should not perish, but have everlasting
life."
Now, the fine folks at In-N-Out would have a Sunday school
teacher armed with various written propaganda stationed at the
front door of each of their restaurants if they actually
thought it would convert people, but they're not quite that
stupid. They know that all the patrons want is a burger,
some fries, and a diet Coke -- and they want it fast so they
can get the hell out of there. So the owners cut their
losses and took what they could get. Like cowards, they
decided to force (albeit covertly) their unsuspecting patrons
to take a little bit of god with them. This allows them
to delude themselves into believing that they are actually
spreading god's (alleged) word. Perhaps they even
believe that this act ensures them a place in heaven.
* The
Godless Bastard is not responsible for damages incurred by
those too stupid to make sure the cup is empty
first.
Please note that their covert Christian
rhetoric doesn't end with the soft drink
cups. Many of their items are packaged (paper wrapped)
with bible verses. Also, in front of every In-N-Out
location you will find a pair of crossed palm trees (logo),
which clearly represent the Christian cross.
Needless to say, I now get my burgers elsewhere...extra
cheeses, hold the Jesus.
Welcome
to the Christian Learning Annex A Free Educational
Service Courtesy of the
Godless Bastard
HOW TO TEACH THE INFIDELS
A LESSON
The Last Resort: Go Ahead. I
Dare You! Sometimes you'll hear
theists argue that it's better to follow their religion than
to be an atheist, simply because if the atheist is right
nothing happens when he dies, but if the theist is right he
goes to heaven while the atheist goes to hell. This is
called Pascal's Wager
(named after the brilliant yet religiously deluded French
philosopher Blaise Pascal who authored it). His argument
is faulty and therefore invalid for several reasons. But
first, here's an example of the pure cowardice that embraces
it...
A former Christian coworker, Rodger, once made me his
conversion pet project. He hounded me with his silly
Jesus rhetoric for 5 years. The more I fleered and
rejected his offerings, the harder he preached. I'm a
bit ashamed to admit this, but I enjoyed watching his
frustration mount. You'd think he would eventually sense
the futility of the situation and save his time and energy for
a more productive endeavor, but he was one resilient little
bastard. (It's no surprise he was in sales!) He
used to tell me how he spent his evenings formulating his plan
of attack to prove his god's existence to me. If he had
a modicum of common sense he would have walked away in search
of weaker prey. However, eventually, in a pathetic act
of desperation and shear cowardice, he resorted to
daring/scaring/goading me into accepting Christ. Like a
mindless robot, he regurgitated the following cowardly,
sheepish, bet-hedging, if you can't beat 'em join 'em mantra
(below), just like the one thousand times he probably
rehearsed it in his head.
MENTAL MASTURBATION
FOR THE RELIGIOUSLY DELUDED Lesson
#3158
Repeat
the following paragraph over and over again (preferably
with a monotone iambic pentameter lilt, almost like
you're chanting) until you firmly convince yourself that
believing in god is the safe bet.
If you accept Christ and
there is no god, then you have nothing to
lose. If you reject Christ and there is no god,
then you have nothing to lose. If you accept
Christ and there is a god, then you have
everything gain. If you reject Christ and there
is a god, then you have everything to lose. All
you have to do is accept him and you can't
possibly
lose!
Very
good! Now you sound just like
Rodger.
How can anyone call this faith? How pathetic.
Talk about playing it safe! This is the mentality of
someone who doesn't know what true faith is. Accepting
any god just to play it safe is the act of a coward, someone
who is afraid to stand alone with his beliefs (or lack
thereof). When I asked him if his god was all knowing,
he replied, "Of course." I said, "Well, then, he would
know that I'm accepting him just to play it safe. Don't
you think he would be just a little insulted by such
disingenuousness and damn me anyway because I tried to pull
one over on him?" He stammered a few times,
mumbled something unintelligible and walked away.
Rodger's all-knowing god must be so proud of him. Bravo,
Rodger! Bravo! At any rate, his incessant
preaching stopped when he left the company. Amen!
Pascal's Wager: A Closer
Look What follows is a textbook example of
how Christians use Pascal's Wager to make themselves feel
better about their own faith-related insecurities and the
fear of possibly being wrong.
Well I do commend you on your
strong convictions. I myself am of the belief of Christ
as my lord and savior. It's unfortunate you've been
given such a message that you have interpreted as "hate
mail". I'm not going to preach at you or try and sway
you in my direction in any way, shape or form. It is
quite obvious that you have gotten the message and
choose to reject it. I understand that you are very
happy and satisfied with your life and beliefs. I am
too. Happier than you can imagine. (or perhaps you
can)
What really seperates us though
fundementally is this:
I believe that when I die, I go
to heaven.
You believe that when you die,
that's it. Game over.
Seeing that we have now both
professed our belief or lack thereof in an afterlife, I
have to say that I have a bit of an advantage over
you. If you're right, when I die, that's it. I will have
lived a happy life and hopefully, did some good things
for the world. Guess what though, I'll never know the
difference and STILL have had a happy life just like
you.
On the other hand, if I'm right,
I go to heaven and live eternally happy AFTER my happy
life here on earth. Unfortunately, based on my beliefs
of your "enlightend" view of things, your afterlife
doesn't look so peachy. I'm sure you're VERY aware of
the Christian beliefs on what happens to people with
your point of view.
So, in the end, lets tally the
score cards:
If you're right, we both live
happy productive lives here on earth and then we
die. Sounds like a tie game to me so
far...
If I'm right, then I go on living
eternally after I die. I don't have to go into detail
what would happen to you. You've heard enough fire,
brimstone, hell and damnation already.
In the end, I have everything to
gain and nothing to lose based on my belief whether I'm
right OR wrong. You unfortunately, aren't afforded the
same "tie game" if you're wrong.
It is what it is. Not going to
try and convert you to ANYTHING. Hey, I even admire
you're conviction in your belief and your admission that
you're willing to let me go on with mine. That's quite
admirable! I acknowlege your bad experiences with the
hell and damnation "bible thumpers" you've encountered
and it saddens me that the message you've gotten seems
to be of hate when that's not at ALL what the God I
believe in is about.
Good luck to you. If you'd like
to talk about other subjects, feel free to shoot me an
email!
Tony
Adams
Don't you just love how he tells me TWICE that he's not
trying to convert me or preach to me. Tell me folks, is
he self-deceiving, clueless, or just a really bad
liar? I can hear him repeating his mantra over and over
again in his head as if to convince himself, just one more
time, that he's on the right track.
This is deep religious insecurity. Sad. Very
sad.
Children
Behaving Badly: Just Wait Until Your Heavenly Father Gets
Home! Children need discipline. I mean,
isn't that a given? When a child steps over the line his
parents discipline him -- or at least we hope they
do. Discipline keeps the child in line and
(hopefully) teaches him right from wrong. Any
reasonable, prudent person would agree that this is a good
thing, But no matter how you slice it this is the most basic
form of control. Usually some form of
punishment does the trick (e.g. spanking, grounding,
taking away toys or privileges) but more often than not just
the mere threat of punishment keeps the child in
line.
But who disciplines the
parents? Who keeps them in line?
We have legislative bodies
to write and enact laws of man. And then there
are courts of law and enforcement agencies to ensure
compliance and intervene when compliance is breached.
And don't forget about the ever watchful eye of society to rat
out those who can't play nicely with the other children.
But you can't be arrested for having an impure thought, lying
to your spouse, or cheating on an algebra
exam.
And then there are acts that are illegal but
too trivial to prosecute or too difficult to prove.
Stealing towels from your hotel room, overstating
charitable cash contributions on your tax return,
parking with a handicapped permit even though
you're not really impaired, oooh, and lying about your
age! Everyone is guilty. Shame, shame on us
all.
Man keeps himself in line
by believing in god (any god), whether it goes by the
name Jehovah, Jesus, Allah, Krishna, Brahma, or Supreme Being
Billy Bob: Dispenser of All Things Good and Overseer of
the Universe. But regardless of the name and natured
ascribed by any one believer, it's all just a facade to mask
the true driving force and its motive.
What's actually at work is a blend of man's life
experience, sense of fairness, parity, perspective,
empathy, common sense, and (most importantly) his
conscience.
To Thine
Own Self Be True The threat of god's wrath is
nothing more than a deluded manifestation of one's
conscience. It's that inner voice that tells us what's
right and what's wrong based on what we've been taught (by
society), what else we can figure out as we go along (through
logic and common sense), and what we fear (breaking man's
law).
Those of us with
an unimpaired, fully functional conscience don't
need the threat of (any) god's wrath to keep ourselves in
check. Likewise,
those operating with a weak, impaired, or malformed
conscience tend to stray from the path of acceptable
behavior. Simple as that.
These people are
so weak and morally off-center that they just can't accept
ultimate personal responsibility for their own failings when
their conscience turns weaker than their urges. So they
mask the aforementioned qualities of conscience with the
facade of a forgiving god and then tender the
cop out excuse that they fell short of his
glory.
"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes
the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after
our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human
frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives
the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such
thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms." -
Albert Einstein
God:
Commander in Grief In many ways, theists are much like
low-ranking military personnel. When it comes to the
rules of engagement, they're not allowed to think or make
decisions. They believe what they're told, they do as
they're told. They follow orders. In the absence
of an order they follow standard operating procedure -- which
keeps them in line and ensures that things go as
planned.
Just as a soldier fears
the repercussions of disobeying or questioning an order, the
religious person fears the eternal backlash of disobeying
or questioning "The Word of God."
Religious people are not
allowed to challenge god's word. How many times have you
heard a believer say, "Who are we to question God's
plan?" or something of that nature when confronted with "why"
questions that they couldn't answer?
If god allowed man
to question his word then he'd be giving man carte
blanche to interpret [read: change] and filter it in any way
he sees fit -- mostly to suit his hypocritical needs. So
to control man and keep him obedient, god ordered [read:
threatened] man not to change anything in the
bible.
This is best illustrated
by the words of The Holy Book of Standard Operating Procedure
itself:
Revelations 22:18 - For I testify
unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this
book, if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add
unto him the plagues that are written in this
book.
Revelations 22:19 - And if any man
shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy,
God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out
of the holy city, and from the things which are written in
this book.
These are patent
threats, just like a parent threatening an act of
discipline to their child: "Don't question me because I'm your
father and while you're living under my
roof..."
We're allegedly
living under god's roof. Well, If we disobey him
he'll take away your toys and kick us out of the holy
city and write us out of the book of life. This
is the threat of losing some special privilege (god's
gifts are a privilege) or being sent to your room without
dinner...for eternity.
I find it interesting that
these two verses are nearly the final words of the last
book of the New Testament. (Only two short verses
follow.) This ends it all with just a little more fear
and intimidation to control the weak and cowardly.
"If people are good only because they fear
punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot
indeed." - Albert Einstein